{"id":267,"date":"2020-07-02T10:00:00","date_gmt":"2020-07-02T08:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.dainst.blog\/eurasien-abteilung\/?p=267"},"modified":"2020-08-05T12:28:15","modified_gmt":"2020-08-05T10:28:15","slug":"geformte-reliefbecher-am-bosporos","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.dainst.blog\/archaeology-in-eurasia\/geformte-reliefbecher-am-bosporos\/","title":{"rendered":"Geformte Reliefbecher am Bosporos"},"content":{"rendered":"\n
\"\"<\/figure>\n\n\n\n

English version below.<\/em><\/strong> Die in hellenistischer Zeit in Formsch\u00fcsseln, in sog. Matrizen, geformte, nicht gedrehte Reliefkeramik war auch am n\u00f6rdlichen Schwarzen Meer beliebt. Am Kimmerischen Bosporos findet sich eine gro\u00dfe Palette importierter sowie lokaler Produkte. So auch das Fragment eines Bechers aus Golubickaja 2, das in der Werkstatt des Kirbei gefertigt wurde.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"\"
Die Arch\u00e4ometrie konnte die in der zweiten H\u00e4lfte des 2. Jh. v. Chr. arbeitende Werkstatt des Kirbei im kleinasiatischen Kyme lokalisieren.
In the Bonn laboratory H. Mommsen was able to locate the Kirbei workshop active in the second half of the 2nd century BC at Kyme in Asia Minor.<\/em><\/strong>
Bildrechte: I. Sed’enkov<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n\n\n\n
\"\"
Die sog. Megarischen Becher sind mit vegetabilem und fig\u00fcrlichem Dekor verziert, wie dieses Gef\u00e4\u00df mit Delphinen aus der Zeit um 150 v. Chr.
The so-called Megarian Bowls are decorated with vegetable and figurative decorations, like this vessel with dolphins from around 150 BC.<\/em><\/strong>
Bildrechte: I. Sed’enkov<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n\n\n\n
\"\"
Fragmente eines weiteren Formbechers mit rein vegetabilem Reliefdekor.
Fragments of another mouldmadebowl with purely vegetable relief decoration also found in Golubitskaya 2.<\/em><\/strong>
Bildrechte: I. Sed’enkov<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n\n\n\n
\"\"
Alle hier gezeigten Reliefbecher stammen\u00a0 aus Golubickaja 2 am Kimmerischen Bosporos, auch dieses aus vielen Fragmenten bestehende St\u00fcck.
All mouldmade relief bowls shown here were found in Golubitskaya 2 at the Cimmerian Bosporos, also this fragmentary piece.<\/em><\/strong>
Bildrechte: I. Sed’enkov<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n\n\n\n

The relief pottery, which in Hellenistic times was formed in moulds, so-called matrices, and not on a pottery wheel, was also popular on the northern shores of the Black Sea. The Cimmerian Bosporos is home to a wide range of imported and local products. One such example is the fragment of a bowl from Golubitskaya 2, which was made in the workshop of Kirbei.<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Beitrag von:<\/strong>
Udo Schlotzhauer

Projektpartner: <\/strong>
Denis Zhuravlev (Staatliches Historisches Museum Moskau)<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Billingual post. Die in hellenistischer Zeit in Formsch\u00fcsseln, in sog. Matrizen, geformte, nicht gedrehte Reliefkeramik war auch am n\u00f6rdlichen Schwarzen Meer beliebt.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":78,"featured_media":268,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[29],"tags":[31],"class_list":["post-267","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-schwarzmeerraum","tag-schwarzmeerraum"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.dainst.blog\/archaeology-in-eurasia\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/267"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.dainst.blog\/archaeology-in-eurasia\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.dainst.blog\/archaeology-in-eurasia\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.dainst.blog\/archaeology-in-eurasia\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/78"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.dainst.blog\/archaeology-in-eurasia\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=267"}],"version-history":[{"count":4,"href":"https:\/\/www.dainst.blog\/archaeology-in-eurasia\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/267\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":449,"href":"https:\/\/www.dainst.blog\/archaeology-in-eurasia\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/267\/revisions\/449"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.dainst.blog\/archaeology-in-eurasia\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/268"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.dainst.blog\/archaeology-in-eurasia\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=267"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.dainst.blog\/archaeology-in-eurasia\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=267"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.dainst.blog\/archaeology-in-eurasia\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=267"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}