{"id":412,"date":"2020-08-05T10:00:00","date_gmt":"2020-08-05T08:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.dainst.blog\/archaeology-in-eurasia\/?p=412"},"modified":"2020-07-24T17:37:40","modified_gmt":"2020-07-24T15:37:40","slug":"landschaftsarchaeologie-im-kaukasus-prospektion","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.dainst.blog\/archaeology-in-eurasia\/landschaftsarchaeologie-im-kaukasus-prospektion\/","title":{"rendered":"Landschaftsarch\u00e4ologie im Kaukasus &#8211; Prospektion"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p><strong><em>English version below. <\/em><\/strong>Im Jahr 2004 wurde im Nordkaukasus s\u00fcdlich des Kurbades Kislovodsk ein neuer Typus bronzezeitlicher Siedlungen gefunden. Die Siedlungen mit symmetrischem Grundriss sind auf Luft- und Satellitenbildern sehr gut sichtbar und konnten zwischen 2006 und 2010 auch am Boden dokumentiert werden.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image size-large\"><img fetchpriority=\"high\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"1024\" height=\"683\" src=\"https:\/\/www.dainst.blog\/archaeology-in-eurasia\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/19\/2020\/07\/Survey-1-1024x683.jpg\" alt=\"\" class=\"wp-image-413\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.dainst.blog\/archaeology-in-eurasia\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/19\/2020\/07\/Survey-1-1024x683.jpg 1024w, https:\/\/www.dainst.blog\/archaeology-in-eurasia\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/19\/2020\/07\/Survey-1-300x200.jpg 300w, https:\/\/www.dainst.blog\/archaeology-in-eurasia\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/19\/2020\/07\/Survey-1-768x512.jpg 768w, https:\/\/www.dainst.blog\/archaeology-in-eurasia\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/19\/2020\/07\/Survey-1-1536x1024.jpg 1536w, https:\/\/www.dainst.blog\/archaeology-in-eurasia\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/19\/2020\/07\/Survey-1-2048x1365.jpg 2048w, https:\/\/www.dainst.blog\/archaeology-in-eurasia\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/19\/2020\/07\/Survey-1-750x500.jpg 750w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px\" \/><figcaption>Dokumentation des Fundplatzes Gumbashi 1 vor der Ausgrabung. \/ <br><em><strong>Documentation of the site Gumbashi 1 prior to excavation.<\/strong><\/em><br>(Foto: A. Belinskij)<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image size-large\"><img decoding=\"async\" width=\"1024\" height=\"716\" src=\"https:\/\/www.dainst.blog\/archaeology-in-eurasia\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/19\/2020\/07\/Fundstellen-3-1024x716.jpg\" alt=\"\" class=\"wp-image-414\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.dainst.blog\/archaeology-in-eurasia\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/19\/2020\/07\/Fundstellen-3-1024x716.jpg 1024w, https:\/\/www.dainst.blog\/archaeology-in-eurasia\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/19\/2020\/07\/Fundstellen-3-300x210.jpg 300w, https:\/\/www.dainst.blog\/archaeology-in-eurasia\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/19\/2020\/07\/Fundstellen-3-768x537.jpg 768w, https:\/\/www.dainst.blog\/archaeology-in-eurasia\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/19\/2020\/07\/Fundstellen-3-1536x1074.jpg 1536w, https:\/\/www.dainst.blog\/archaeology-in-eurasia\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/19\/2020\/07\/Fundstellen-3-2048x1432.jpg 2048w, https:\/\/www.dainst.blog\/archaeology-in-eurasia\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/19\/2020\/07\/Fundstellen-3-750x524.jpg 750w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px\" \/><figcaption>Die Siedlung Ransyrt 3 vom Gegenhang aus gesehen. \/ <br><em><strong>The site Ransyrt 3 from the opposite slope.<\/strong><\/em><br>(Foto: A. Belinskij)<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image size-large\"><img decoding=\"async\" width=\"1024\" height=\"768\" src=\"https:\/\/www.dainst.blog\/archaeology-in-eurasia\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/19\/2020\/07\/P1060371-1024x768.jpg\" alt=\"\" class=\"wp-image-415\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.dainst.blog\/archaeology-in-eurasia\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/19\/2020\/07\/P1060371-1024x768.jpg 1024w, https:\/\/www.dainst.blog\/archaeology-in-eurasia\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/19\/2020\/07\/P1060371-300x225.jpg 300w, https:\/\/www.dainst.blog\/archaeology-in-eurasia\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/19\/2020\/07\/P1060371-768x576.jpg 768w, https:\/\/www.dainst.blog\/archaeology-in-eurasia\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/19\/2020\/07\/P1060371-1536x1152.jpg 1536w, https:\/\/www.dainst.blog\/archaeology-in-eurasia\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/19\/2020\/07\/P1060371-2048x1536.jpg 2048w, https:\/\/www.dainst.blog\/archaeology-in-eurasia\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/19\/2020\/07\/P1060371-750x563.jpg 750w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px\" \/><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<p><strong><em>In 2004, a new type of Bronze Age settlement was found in the North Caucasus south of the spa resort of Kislovodsk. The settlements with symmetrical layouts are very well visible on aerial and satellite images and were also documented at the ground between 2006 and 2010.<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Beitrag von: <\/strong>Sabine Reinhold<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Koorperationspartner:<\/strong> Andrej B. Belinksij, Dmitrij S. Korobov<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Bilingual post. Im Jahr 2004 wurde im Nordkaukasus s\u00fcdlich des Kurbades Kislovodsk ein neuer Typus bronzezeitlicher Siedlungen gefunden.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":78,"featured_media":415,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[34],"tags":[48],"class_list":["post-412","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-kaukasus","tag-kaukasus"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.dainst.blog\/archaeology-in-eurasia\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/412"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.dainst.blog\/archaeology-in-eurasia\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.dainst.blog\/archaeology-in-eurasia\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.dainst.blog\/archaeology-in-eurasia\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/78"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.dainst.blog\/archaeology-in-eurasia\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=412"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"https:\/\/www.dainst.blog\/archaeology-in-eurasia\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/412\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":433,"href":"https:\/\/www.dainst.blog\/archaeology-in-eurasia\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/412\/revisions\/433"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.dainst.blog\/archaeology-in-eurasia\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/415"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.dainst.blog\/archaeology-in-eurasia\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=412"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.dainst.blog\/archaeology-in-eurasia\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=412"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.dainst.blog\/archaeology-in-eurasia\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=412"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}