{"id":424,"date":"2020-08-12T10:00:00","date_gmt":"2020-08-12T08:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.dainst.blog\/archaeology-in-eurasia\/?p=424"},"modified":"2020-07-24T18:02:54","modified_gmt":"2020-07-24T16:02:54","slug":"neolithische-siedlung-aruchlo-georgien-5800-5400-v-chr-2","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.dainst.blog\/archaeology-in-eurasia\/neolithische-siedlung-aruchlo-georgien-5800-5400-v-chr-2\/","title":{"rendered":"Neolithische Siedlung Aruchlo\/Georgien 5800-5400 v. Chr."},"content":{"rendered":"\n

Zu den au\u00dfergew\u00f6hnlichsten Objekten aus Geweih geh\u00f6ren phallussartige Erzeugnisse, die sich deutlich von Geweihhacken unterscheiden. Sie weisen im oberen Teil zwei reliefierte Rundungen auf, die die Eichel eines Penis darstellen. Sie sind horizontal durchlocht, weisen keine Abnutzungsspuren auf und sind gut poliert.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"\"<\/figure>\n\n\n\n
\"\"<\/figure>\n\n\n\n
\"\"
Stabaufsatz aus Hirschgeweih in Form eines Phallus. \/
Deer antler stick attachment representing a phallus.<\/em><\/strong>
(Fotos: S. Hansen)<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n\n\n\n

The most extraordinary objects made of horn include phallus-like products that differ significantly from hoes made of antler. They have two carved out curved in the upper part, which represent a penis glans. They are perforated horizontally, show no signs of usage and are well polished.<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Beitrag von:<\/strong> Katrin Bastert-Lamprichs  <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Kooperationspartner<\/strong>:
Prof. Dr. Svend Hansen, Eurasien-Abteilung des DAI, Berlin und
Prof. Dr. Guram Mirzchulava \u201eOtar Lordkipanidze-Zentrum f\u00fcr Arch\u00e4ologische Forschungen\u201c des Staatlichen Historischen Museums Georgien, Tbilissi<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Weitere Informationen: <\/strong>Aruchlo \u2013 Ein fr\u00fchneolithischer Tell des 6. Jahrtausends v. Chr.<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Bilingual post. Zu den au\u00dfergew\u00f6hnlichsten Objekten aus Geweih geh\u00f6ren phallussartige Erzeugnisse, die sich deutlich von Geweihhacken unterscheiden.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":78,"featured_media":425,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[34],"tags":[48],"class_list":["post-424","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-kaukasus","tag-kaukasus"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.dainst.blog\/archaeology-in-eurasia\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/424"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.dainst.blog\/archaeology-in-eurasia\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.dainst.blog\/archaeology-in-eurasia\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.dainst.blog\/archaeology-in-eurasia\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/78"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.dainst.blog\/archaeology-in-eurasia\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=424"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/www.dainst.blog\/archaeology-in-eurasia\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/424\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":431,"href":"https:\/\/www.dainst.blog\/archaeology-in-eurasia\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/424\/revisions\/431"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.dainst.blog\/archaeology-in-eurasia\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/425"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.dainst.blog\/archaeology-in-eurasia\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=424"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.dainst.blog\/archaeology-in-eurasia\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=424"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.dainst.blog\/archaeology-in-eurasia\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=424"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}