{"id":491,"date":"2020-09-16T08:00:00","date_gmt":"2020-09-16T06:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.dainst.blog\/archaeology-in-eurasia\/?p=491"},"modified":"2020-12-14T12:59:36","modified_gmt":"2020-12-14T11:59:36","slug":"fruehbronzezeitliches-dorf-tel-yaqush-3600-2550-v-chr-2","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.dainst.blog\/archaeology-in-eurasia\/fruehbronzezeitliches-dorf-tel-yaqush-3600-2550-v-chr-2\/","title":{"rendered":"Fr\u00fchbronzezeitliches Dorf Tel Yaqush (~3600-2550 v. Chr.)"},"content":{"rendered":"\n
\"\"<\/figure>\n\n\n\n

English version below. <\/em><\/strong>Fragment eines Feuerbocks mit applizierter anthropomorpher Dekoration. Andirons mit schematischen Darstellungen menschlicher Gesichter kennzeichnen die H\u00e4user der Khirbet Kerak Ware \/ Kura-Araxes Immigranten, die im 29. Jahrhundert v. Chr. im Jordantal ankamen.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"\"
Khirbet Kerak Ware: Feuerbock-Fragment mit schematischer Darstellung eines menschlichen Gesichts (Nase und zwei Augen). \/ Andiron fragment bearing   schematic representation of a human face (nose and two eyes).<\/em><\/strong>
Bildrechte: DAI, Eurasien-Abteilung<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n\n\n\n

Fragment of an andiron (portable hearths) with applied anthropomorphic decoration. Andirons bearing schematic representations of human faces characterize the houses of Khirbet Kerak Ware\/Kura-Araxes immigrants, arrived in the Southern Levant in the 29th century BCE.<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Beitrag von:<\/strong> Mark Iserlis<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Kooperationspartner: <\/strong>
Yael Rotem (University of Haifa and University of Pennsylvania Museum of Archaeology and Anthropology)  

Mitchell Rothman (University of Pennsylvania Museumof Archaeology and Anthropology).<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Weitere Beitr\u00e4ge zum Dorf Tel Yaqush:<\/strong>
Zylindersiegelamulett von Tel Yaquish<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Bilingual post. Fragment eines Feuerbocks mit applizierter anthropomorpher Dekoration.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":78,"featured_media":492,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[47],"tags":[27],"class_list":["post-491","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-levante","tag-levante"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.dainst.blog\/archaeology-in-eurasia\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/491"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.dainst.blog\/archaeology-in-eurasia\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.dainst.blog\/archaeology-in-eurasia\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.dainst.blog\/archaeology-in-eurasia\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/78"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.dainst.blog\/archaeology-in-eurasia\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=491"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/www.dainst.blog\/archaeology-in-eurasia\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/491\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":740,"href":"https:\/\/www.dainst.blog\/archaeology-in-eurasia\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/491\/revisions\/740"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.dainst.blog\/archaeology-in-eurasia\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/492"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.dainst.blog\/archaeology-in-eurasia\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=491"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.dainst.blog\/archaeology-in-eurasia\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=491"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.dainst.blog\/archaeology-in-eurasia\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=491"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}