{"id":695,"date":"2020-12-30T09:00:00","date_gmt":"2020-12-30T08:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.dainst.blog\/archaeology-in-eurasia\/?p=695"},"modified":"2020-12-06T22:37:46","modified_gmt":"2020-12-06T21:37:46","slug":"der-grosse-kurgan-von-bajkara-in-nordkasachstan","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.dainst.blog\/archaeology-in-eurasia\/der-grosse-kurgan-von-bajkara-in-nordkasachstan\/","title":{"rendered":"Der gro\u00dfe Kurgan von Bajkara in Nordkasachstan"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image size-large\"><img fetchpriority=\"high\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"1024\" height=\"160\" src=\"https:\/\/www.dainst.blog\/archaeology-in-eurasia\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/19\/2020\/06\/Eurasien-Blog-Karte-1-1024x160.jpg\" alt=\"\" class=\"wp-image-282\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.dainst.blog\/archaeology-in-eurasia\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/19\/2020\/06\/Eurasien-Blog-Karte-1-1024x160.jpg 1024w, https:\/\/www.dainst.blog\/archaeology-in-eurasia\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/19\/2020\/06\/Eurasien-Blog-Karte-1-300x47.jpg 300w, https:\/\/www.dainst.blog\/archaeology-in-eurasia\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/19\/2020\/06\/Eurasien-Blog-Karte-1-768x120.jpg 768w, https:\/\/www.dainst.blog\/archaeology-in-eurasia\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/19\/2020\/06\/Eurasien-Blog-Karte-1-750x117.jpg 750w, https:\/\/www.dainst.blog\/archaeology-in-eurasia\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/19\/2020\/06\/Eurasien-Blog-Karte-1.jpg 1250w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px\" \/><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<p><strong><em>English version below.<\/em><\/strong> Wegen der komplexen Architektur des Denkmals, mit Dromos, Graben, Steineinfassung und aufw\u00e4ndiger Aufsch\u00fcttung und dem Fehlen einer skythenzeitlichen Bestattung, wurde der Kurgan 1 von Bajkara als Heiligtum interpretiert. In der letzten Phase wurde der Platz schlie\u00dflich mit einer sarmatische Bestattung belegt, die in der Neuzeit beraubt wurde.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image size-large\"><img decoding=\"async\" width=\"1024\" height=\"659\" src=\"https:\/\/www.dainst.blog\/archaeology-in-eurasia\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/19\/2020\/12\/Bajkara-Profile-1024x659.png\" alt=\"\" class=\"wp-image-698\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.dainst.blog\/archaeology-in-eurasia\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/19\/2020\/12\/Bajkara-Profile-1024x659.png 1024w, https:\/\/www.dainst.blog\/archaeology-in-eurasia\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/19\/2020\/12\/Bajkara-Profile-300x193.png 300w, https:\/\/www.dainst.blog\/archaeology-in-eurasia\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/19\/2020\/12\/Bajkara-Profile-768x494.png 768w, https:\/\/www.dainst.blog\/archaeology-in-eurasia\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/19\/2020\/12\/Bajkara-Profile-1536x989.png 1536w, https:\/\/www.dainst.blog\/archaeology-in-eurasia\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/19\/2020\/12\/Bajkara-Profile-750x483.png 750w, https:\/\/www.dainst.blog\/archaeology-in-eurasia\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/19\/2020\/12\/Bajkara-Profile.png 1628w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px\" \/><figcaption>In den Profilen sind die Absenkungen sichtbar sowie die stratigrafische Abfolge der Aufsch\u00fcttung (Birkenrinde, Rasensoden, Lehm, Steine). \/ <strong><em>In the sections the subsidence is visible, as well as the stratigraphic sequence of the earthworks (birch bark, grass sods, clay, stones).<\/em><\/strong><br>(Foto: DAI Eurasien-Abteilung)<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image size-large\"><img decoding=\"async\" width=\"1024\" height=\"668\" src=\"https:\/\/www.dainst.blog\/archaeology-in-eurasia\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/19\/2020\/12\/Bajkara-Profil-Detail-1024x668.png\" alt=\"\" class=\"wp-image-697\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.dainst.blog\/archaeology-in-eurasia\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/19\/2020\/12\/Bajkara-Profil-Detail-1024x668.png 1024w, https:\/\/www.dainst.blog\/archaeology-in-eurasia\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/19\/2020\/12\/Bajkara-Profil-Detail-300x196.png 300w, https:\/\/www.dainst.blog\/archaeology-in-eurasia\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/19\/2020\/12\/Bajkara-Profil-Detail-768x501.png 768w, https:\/\/www.dainst.blog\/archaeology-in-eurasia\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/19\/2020\/12\/Bajkara-Profil-Detail-1536x1002.png 1536w, https:\/\/www.dainst.blog\/archaeology-in-eurasia\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/19\/2020\/12\/Bajkara-Profil-Detail-750x489.png 750w, https:\/\/www.dainst.blog\/archaeology-in-eurasia\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/19\/2020\/12\/Bajkara-Profil-Detail.png 1615w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px\" \/><figcaption>Detail vom Profil mit dem m\u00e4chtigen Rasensodenaufbau und der Lehmpackung. \/ <strong><em>Detail oft he section with the thick grass sod structure and clay package.<\/em><\/strong><br>(DAI Eurasien-Abteilung)<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image size-large\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"1024\" height=\"836\" src=\"https:\/\/www.dainst.blog\/archaeology-in-eurasia\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/19\/2020\/12\/Bajkara-Goldvogel-1024x836.png\" alt=\"\" class=\"wp-image-696\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.dainst.blog\/archaeology-in-eurasia\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/19\/2020\/12\/Bajkara-Goldvogel-1024x836.png 1024w, https:\/\/www.dainst.blog\/archaeology-in-eurasia\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/19\/2020\/12\/Bajkara-Goldvogel-300x245.png 300w, https:\/\/www.dainst.blog\/archaeology-in-eurasia\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/19\/2020\/12\/Bajkara-Goldvogel-768x627.png 768w, https:\/\/www.dainst.blog\/archaeology-in-eurasia\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/19\/2020\/12\/Bajkara-Goldvogel-750x613.png 750w, https:\/\/www.dainst.blog\/archaeology-in-eurasia\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/19\/2020\/12\/Bajkara-Goldvogel.png 1244w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px\" \/><figcaption>Vogelfigur aus Goldblech aus dem Dromos, wohl der \u00e4lteste, skythische Phase des Denkmals zugeh\u00f6rend. \/ <strong><em>Bird figure from gold foil from the dromos, probably from the oldest Scythian phase of the monument.<\/em><\/strong><br>(Foto: DAI Eurasien-Abteilung)<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<p><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong><em>Due tot he complex architecture oft he monument, with dromos, ditch, stone enclosure and elaborate earthworks, as well as due tot he lack of a Scythian period burial, the Kurgan 1 of Baykara has been interpreted as sanctuary. In the last phase of its construction the site was occupieed by a Sarmatian burial, robbed in modern times.<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Projektleitung<\/strong>:<br>H. Parzinger. A. Nagler (DAI, Berlin)<br>V. Zajbert, A. Ple\u0161akov (Nordkasachische Universit\u00e4t, Petropavlovsk)<br><br><strong>Partnerinstitution:<\/strong> Nordkasachische Universit\u00e4t, Petropavlovsk<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Beitrag von:<\/strong> Rodica Boroffka<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Bilingual post. Wegen der komplexen Architektur des Denkmals, mit Dromos, Graben, Steineinfassung und&#8230;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":78,"featured_media":698,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[33],"tags":[32],"class_list":["post-695","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-zentralasien","tag-zentralasien"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.dainst.blog\/archaeology-in-eurasia\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/695"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.dainst.blog\/archaeology-in-eurasia\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.dainst.blog\/archaeology-in-eurasia\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.dainst.blog\/archaeology-in-eurasia\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/78"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.dainst.blog\/archaeology-in-eurasia\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=695"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/www.dainst.blog\/archaeology-in-eurasia\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/695\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":700,"href":"https:\/\/www.dainst.blog\/archaeology-in-eurasia\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/695\/revisions\/700"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.dainst.blog\/archaeology-in-eurasia\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/698"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.dainst.blog\/archaeology-in-eurasia\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=695"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.dainst.blog\/archaeology-in-eurasia\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=695"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.dainst.blog\/archaeology-in-eurasia\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=695"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}