{"id":307,"date":"2023-10-17T17:20:49","date_gmt":"2023-10-17T15:20:49","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.dainst.blog\/ukrainian-archaeological-heritage\/?p=307"},"modified":"2023-10-17T17:21:15","modified_gmt":"2023-10-17T15:21:15","slug":"dai4ukr-purified-by-fire-the-funeral-rite-of-the-slavs-in-the-pre-state-period-on-the-territory-of-ukraine-and-neighboring-regions","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.dainst.blog\/ukrainian-archaeological-heritage\/2023\/10\/17\/dai4ukr-purified-by-fire-the-funeral-rite-of-the-slavs-in-the-pre-state-period-on-the-territory-of-ukraine-and-neighboring-regions\/","title":{"rendered":"DAI4UKR: Purified by Fire \u2013 The Funeral Rite of the Slavs in the Pre-State Period on the Territory of Ukraine and Neighboring Regions"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p><em>The heritage work is not only saving the sites or objects under acute threat. An essential part of our assistance is also funding of projects that document and analyze the archaeological record and make it available to other scientists by publishing the results of studies. Such work devoted to the re-evaluation of the burial customs of the early medieval communities in the Dnipro region in the light of new data is being carried out by <strong>Dmytro Bibikov <\/strong>(<strong>Fig. 1<\/strong>) from the Institute of Archaeology of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine. Today, Dmytro Bibikov reports about his monograph in progress on cultural processes in the second half of the 1<sup>st<\/sup> millennium AD.<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image size-large is-resized\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.dainst.blog\/ukrainian-archaeological-heritage\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/46\/2023\/10\/Bibikov-Photo.jpg\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/www.dainst.blog\/ukrainian-archaeological-heritage\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/46\/2023\/10\/Bibikov-Photo-1024x691.jpg\" alt=\"\" class=\"wp-image-308\" width=\"840\" height=\"566\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.dainst.blog\/ukrainian-archaeological-heritage\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/46\/2023\/10\/Bibikov-Photo-1024x691.jpg 1024w, https:\/\/www.dainst.blog\/ukrainian-archaeological-heritage\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/46\/2023\/10\/Bibikov-Photo-300x203.jpg 300w, https:\/\/www.dainst.blog\/ukrainian-archaeological-heritage\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/46\/2023\/10\/Bibikov-Photo-768x518.jpg 768w, https:\/\/www.dainst.blog\/ukrainian-archaeological-heritage\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/46\/2023\/10\/Bibikov-Photo.jpg 1280w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 840px) 100vw, 840px\" \/><\/a><figcaption class=\"wp-element-caption\"><sup><strong>Fig. 1<\/strong>: Dmytro Bibikov during his fieldwork at the Kytaiv mound necropolis (photograph: I. Zotsenko).<\/sup><\/figcaption><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<p>Different generations of researchers addressed the funeral rite of the Eastern Slavs and the dynamics of its development on the eve of Kyiv Rus. These issues are important not only for the study of worldviews of the Slavic communities, but also for the understanding of the state-building, ethno-cultural and social processes of the early Middle Ages in Central-Eastern Europe. In Ukraine, Slavic materials of the last quarter of the 1<sup>st<\/sup> millennium AD belong to two separate cultural traditions. The bearers of Raiky culture inhabited the right-bank of the Dnipro River, Volhynia and the Dnister River region, and the Romny culture is associated with the Severians known from the chronicles, who lived on the left bank of the Dnipro River.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>In my project with a monograph as an outcome I analyze the funeral rite of the Eastern Slavs of the pre-state period against the background of a wide range of synchronous materials from Central and Eastern Europe. The study contains the most comprehensive and reliable selection of investigated burials (more than 300 complexes) and burial grounds, presented as a catalogue in the appendices.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<div class=\"wp-block-columns is-layout-flex wp-container-core-columns-is-layout-1 wp-block-columns-is-layout-flex\">\n<div class=\"wp-block-column is-layout-flow wp-block-column-is-layout-flow\" style=\"flex-basis:66.66%\">\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image size-large\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.dainst.blog\/ukrainian-archaeological-heritage\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/46\/2023\/10\/fig.1.jpg\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"1024\" height=\"939\" src=\"https:\/\/www.dainst.blog\/ukrainian-archaeological-heritage\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/46\/2023\/10\/fig.1-1024x939.jpg\" alt=\"\" class=\"wp-image-309\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.dainst.blog\/ukrainian-archaeological-heritage\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/46\/2023\/10\/fig.1-1024x939.jpg 1024w, https:\/\/www.dainst.blog\/ukrainian-archaeological-heritage\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/46\/2023\/10\/fig.1-300x275.jpg 300w, https:\/\/www.dainst.blog\/ukrainian-archaeological-heritage\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/46\/2023\/10\/fig.1-768x704.jpg 768w, https:\/\/www.dainst.blog\/ukrainian-archaeological-heritage\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/46\/2023\/10\/fig.1-1536x1408.jpg 1536w, https:\/\/www.dainst.blog\/ukrainian-archaeological-heritage\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/46\/2023\/10\/fig.1-2048x1877.jpg 2048w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px\" \/><\/a><figcaption class=\"wp-element-caption\"><sup><strong>Fig.\u00a02<\/strong>: Raiky burials mounds with quadrangular structures: 1\u20133 \u2013 Mezhirichka (adapted from Rusanova 1959); 4 \u2013 Radasts (adapted from Rusanova 1969); 5 \u2013 Velyka Gorbasha (adapted from Rusanova 1961).<\/sup><\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n<div class=\"wp-block-column is-layout-flow wp-block-column-is-layout-flow\" style=\"flex-basis:33.33%\">\n<p>The funeral rite of the Raiky culture has not been sufficiently studied yet. Modern methodological approaches make it possible to assess its character in a new way. Wooden constructions of various types are quite common in the mounds of the Raiky culture. Burned rectangular structures made of horizontal logs became the most common (<strong>Fig.&nbsp;2<\/strong>). They have direct and numerous analogies on the territory of Poland, the Czech Republic, Slovakia and East Germany (<strong>Fig.&nbsp;3<\/strong>), which are considered as models of residential buildings. <\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n<p>In the Chornivka and Dobrostany cemeteries, most of the barrows contained pillar pits. This element, which has always been neglected by researchers, is also widely known in the West Slavic lands, which testifies to common worldviews that were widespread in the 8<sup>th<\/sup>\u201310<sup>th<\/sup> centuries among Slavs from the Elba to the Dnieper. It is believed that burial urns were placed on the pillars, since accumulations of burned bones and fragments of ceramics have been recorded around the pillars on the surface of the mounds (<strong>Fig.&nbsp;4<\/strong>).<\/p>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image size-large\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.dainst.blog\/ukrainian-archaeological-heritage\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/46\/2023\/10\/fig.2-scaled.jpg\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"1024\" height=\"506\" src=\"https:\/\/www.dainst.blog\/ukrainian-archaeological-heritage\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/46\/2023\/10\/fig.2-1024x506.jpg\" alt=\"\" class=\"wp-image-310\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.dainst.blog\/ukrainian-archaeological-heritage\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/46\/2023\/10\/fig.2-1024x506.jpg 1024w, https:\/\/www.dainst.blog\/ukrainian-archaeological-heritage\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/46\/2023\/10\/fig.2-300x148.jpg 300w, https:\/\/www.dainst.blog\/ukrainian-archaeological-heritage\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/46\/2023\/10\/fig.2-768x379.jpg 768w, https:\/\/www.dainst.blog\/ukrainian-archaeological-heritage\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/46\/2023\/10\/fig.2-1536x758.jpg 1536w, https:\/\/www.dainst.blog\/ukrainian-archaeological-heritage\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/46\/2023\/10\/fig.2-2048x1011.jpg 2048w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px\" \/><\/a><figcaption class=\"wp-element-caption\"><sup><strong>Fig.\u00a03<\/strong>: Distribution of wooden structures in Slavic barrows of the 8th\u201310th centuries: a \u2013 buildings of the Lipsko type and typologically similar quadrangular structures; b \u2013 quadrangular structures of other types; c \u2013 ring fences; d \u2013 pillar structures associated with burials (map: D.\u00a0Bibikov).<\/sup><\/figcaption><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<div class=\"wp-block-columns is-layout-flex wp-container-core-columns-is-layout-2 wp-block-columns-is-layout-flex\">\n<div class=\"wp-block-column is-layout-flow wp-block-column-is-layout-flow\" style=\"flex-basis:75%\">\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image size-large is-resized\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.dainst.blog\/ukrainian-archaeological-heritage\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/46\/2023\/10\/fig.3-scaled.jpg\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/www.dainst.blog\/ukrainian-archaeological-heritage\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/46\/2023\/10\/fig.3-669x1024.jpg\" alt=\"\" class=\"wp-image-311\" width=\"382\" height=\"585\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.dainst.blog\/ukrainian-archaeological-heritage\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/46\/2023\/10\/fig.3-669x1024.jpg 669w, https:\/\/www.dainst.blog\/ukrainian-archaeological-heritage\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/46\/2023\/10\/fig.3-196x300.jpg 196w, https:\/\/www.dainst.blog\/ukrainian-archaeological-heritage\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/46\/2023\/10\/fig.3-768x1176.jpg 768w, https:\/\/www.dainst.blog\/ukrainian-archaeological-heritage\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/46\/2023\/10\/fig.3-1003x1536.jpg 1003w, https:\/\/www.dainst.blog\/ukrainian-archaeological-heritage\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/46\/2023\/10\/fig.3-1337x2048.jpg 1337w, https:\/\/www.dainst.blog\/ukrainian-archaeological-heritage\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/46\/2023\/10\/fig.3-scaled.jpg 1672w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 382px) 100vw, 382px\" \/><\/a><figcaption class=\"wp-element-caption\"><sup><strong>Fig.&nbsp;4<\/strong>: Several reconstructions of \u201cpillar\u201d burials: 1 \u2013 Garo (adapted from Wetzel 1979); 2 \u2013 Garo (adapted from Wetzel 2012); 3 \u2013 Opsa (adapted from Plavinsky et al. 2014).<\/sup><\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n<div class=\"wp-block-column is-layout-flow wp-block-column-is-layout-flow\" style=\"flex-basis:75%\">\n<p>In the upcoming monograph, I also make a new attempt at a comprehensive analysis of the burial rite of the Romny culture, which is somewhat better illuminated in the archaeological literature. Separate sections of the planned monograph are devoted to the semantics of the Slavic funeral rite, as well as ethno-cultural processes on the territory of Ukraine in the second half of the 1<sup>st<\/sup> millennium AD according to the burial contexts. I analyze the changes that occurred in the funeral rite of the Eastern Slavs at the end of the 10<sup>th<\/sup> century AD and address the reasons for these changes.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n<p><em>References<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><em>Plavinsky et al 2014: M. Plavinsky\/<\/em><em>L. Duchyts\/<\/em><em>A. Plavinsky\/<\/em><em>V. Shadyra, Mound cemeteries of the west of Braslavskyi Paazerya (excavation materials 1978<\/em><em>\u20132010) <\/em><em>(Minsk<\/em><em> <\/em><em>2014).<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><em>Rusanova 1959: \u0418.\u041f. \u0420\u0443\u0441\u0430\u043d\u043e\u0432\u0430, \u041e\u0442\u0447\u0435\u0442 \u043e \u0440\u0430\u0431\u043e\u0442\u0435 \u041f\u0440\u0430\u0432\u043e\u0431\u0435\u0440\u0435\u0436\u043d\u0435\u0433\u043e \u043e\u0442\u0440\u044f\u0434\u0430 \u0427\u0435\u0440\u043d\u0438\u0433\u043e\u0432\u0441\u043a\u043e\u0439 \u044d\u043a\u0441\u043f\u0435\u0434\u0438\u0446\u0438\u0438 \u0418\u0418\u041c\u041a \u0410\u041d \u0421\u0421\u0421\u0420 \u0437\u0430 1959 \u0433. \u041d\u0430\u0443\u043a\u043e\u0432\u0456\u0439 \u0430\u0440\u0445\u0456\u0432 \u0406\u0410 \u041d\u0410\u041d\u0423 \u0444. \u0435. 1959\/20\u0430.<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><em>Rusanova 1961: <\/em><em>&nbsp;\u0418.\u041f. \u0420\u0443\u0441\u0430\u043d\u043e\u0432\u0430, \u041e\u0442\u0447\u0435\u0442 \u043e \u0440\u0430\u0431\u043e\u0442\u0435 \u0414\u0440\u0435\u0432\u043b\u044f\u043d\u0441\u043a\u043e\u0433\u043e \u043e\u0442\u0440\u044f\u0434\u0430 \u0414\u043d\u0435\u043f\u0440\u043e\u0432\u0441\u043a\u043e\u0439 \u0430\u0440\u0445\u0435\u043e\u043b\u043e\u0433\u0438\u0447\u0435\u0441\u043a\u043e\u0439 \u044d\u043a\u0441\u043f\u0435\u0434\u0438\u0446\u0438\u0438 \u0418\u043d\u0441\u0442\u0438\u0442\u0443\u0442\u0430 \u0430\u0440\u0445\u0435\u043e\u043b\u043e\u0433\u0438\u0438 \u0410\u041d \u0421\u0421\u0421\u0420 \u0437\u0430 1961 \u0433. \u041d\u0430\u0443\u043a\u043e\u0432\u0456\u0439 \u0430\u0440\u0445\u0456\u0432 \u0406\u0410 \u041d\u0410\u041d\u0423 \u0444. \u0435., 1961\/23.<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><em>Rusanova 1969:&nbsp;\u0418.\u041f. \u0420\u0443\u0441\u0430\u043d\u043e\u0432\u0430, \u041e\u0442\u0447\u0435\u0442 \u043e \u0440\u0430\u0431\u043e\u0442\u0435 \u0412\u043e\u043b\u044b\u043d\u0441\u043a\u043e\u0439 \u044d\u043a\u0441\u043f\u0435\u0434\u0438\u0446\u0438\u0438 \u0418\u043d\u0441\u0442\u0438\u0442\u0443\u0442\u0430 \u0430\u0440\u0445\u0435\u043e\u043b\u043e\u0433\u0438\u0438 \u0410\u041d \u0421\u0421\u0421\u0420 \u0437\u0430 1969 \u0433. \u041d\u0430\u0443\u043a\u043e\u0432\u0456\u0439 \u0430\u0440\u0445\u0456\u0432 \u0406\u0410 \u041d\u0410\u041d\u0423 \u0444. \u0435., 1969\/103.<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><em>Wetzel 1979: G. Wetzel, Slawische H\u00fcgelgr\u00e4ber bei Gahro, Kr. Finsterwalde. Ver\u00f6\ufb00entlichungen des Museums f\u00fcr<\/em><em> Ur- und Fr\u00fchgeschichte Potsdam 12, <\/em><em>1979, 129<\/em><em>\u2013158.<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><em>Wetzel<\/em><em> 2012: G.<\/em><em> <\/em><em>Wetzel, Slawische Gr\u00e4ber. In: <\/em><em>F. Schopper<\/em><em>\/D. D\u00e4hnert<\/em><em> (<\/em><em>Hrsg.)<\/em><em>, Arch\u00e4ologie in der Niederlausitz <\/em><em>(Cottbus<\/em><em> 2012) 228<\/em><em>\u2013231.<\/em><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>The heritage work is not only saving the sites or objects under acute threat. An essential part of our assistance is also funding of&#8230;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":156,"featured_media":308,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[4],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-307","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-uah-general"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.dainst.blog\/ukrainian-archaeological-heritage\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/307"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.dainst.blog\/ukrainian-archaeological-heritage\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.dainst.blog\/ukrainian-archaeological-heritage\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.dainst.blog\/ukrainian-archaeological-heritage\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/156"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.dainst.blog\/ukrainian-archaeological-heritage\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=307"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"https:\/\/www.dainst.blog\/ukrainian-archaeological-heritage\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/307\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":314,"href":"https:\/\/www.dainst.blog\/ukrainian-archaeological-heritage\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/307\/revisions\/314"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.dainst.blog\/ukrainian-archaeological-heritage\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/308"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.dainst.blog\/ukrainian-archaeological-heritage\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=307"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.dainst.blog\/ukrainian-archaeological-heritage\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=307"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.dainst.blog\/ukrainian-archaeological-heritage\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=307"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}