with No Comments

The classical archaeologist Eugen Petersen is known primarily as the long-serving director of DAI Rome. His name is not, however, necessarily associated with the DAI Athens: a good reason to remember him here and recount his time at the Athenian department.

The Centraldirektion (Executive Committee [EC]) of the DAI appointed Eugen Petersen First Secretary of the department in 1886. He thus succeeded Ulrich Köhler, when the latter left Athens to assume a professorship in Berlin after eleven highly meritorious years in office.

When the official announcement (fig. 1) of the appointment of ‘Professor Dr. Eugen Petersen’ was sent to Athens on October 1, 1886, Köhler had apparently already departed, because the letter was addressed to Habbo G. Lolling, who was temporarily in charge of the department.

Fig. 1: On behalf of the Centraldirection of the DAI, Adolf Kirchhoff informs H. Lolling of the appointment of Eugen Petersen as First Secretary. Archive of the DAI at Athens, Altregistratur

Term in office in Athens

When the Executive Committee decided in favor of Eugen Petersen as its new, now third director of the Athenian department, he was an established, productive scholar with many years of professional experience – among other things, as professor at the universities of Dorpat (Tartu, Estonia) and Prague – with good connections in scholarly circles. In 1873, for example, he has composed a monograph on Greek art titled ‘Die Kunst des Pheidias am Parthenon und zu Olympia’ (‘The art of Pheidias on the Parthenon and at Olympia’). As leading secretary, he spoke at a total of five meetings of the Institute during the Winter of 1886/1887; that is, he gave brief scholarly lectures. For example, on December 9, 1886 – on the occasion of the ‘Winckelmannfeier’ – celebrating the birthday of Johann Joachim Winckelmann – as one of the founders of classical archaeology in Germany – he delivered a talk about Archaic female sculpture on the Acropolis. As usual, several of these talks subsequently appeared in expanded form in the Institute’s own journal, Athenische Mitteilungen. As emerges clearly from them, he dedicated himself predominantly to the art and history of the Acropolis during his time at Athens.

Petersen lived with his wife Ida (née Michaelis) in a faculty apartment (Sporn – Bilis 2018, 22 and fig. 29) in a building rented by the Institute at 55 Akadimias Street. His brother-in-law Adolf Michaelis had lived in a room there not long beforehand in September 1886 and, as he wrote in a letter to his family, anticipated that the couple’s arrival would bring about a significant improvement to his surroundings: “My room is adequate, if small […] You can tell from the furnishings and everything else that only bachelors have ever lived here. That explains a certain lack of comfort […] Ida will find a grateful field for reforms here, likewise in an audit of the furniture.” (von Steuben 2004, 99). The First Secretary and his wife indeed seem to have taken pains to show hospitality: there are accounts of dinners hosted by the Petersens to which they invited younger archaeologists. In winter, however, the apartment nonetheless appears to have been very uncomfortable on account of poor heating.

The experienced excavator Wilhelm Dörpfeld was appointed alongside Petersen as Second Secretary in Athens. In March 1887 – or more precisely, from March 1 to March 13 –Petersen and Dörpfeld undertook a joint excavation in Athens – between the Pnyx and the Theseion. Petersen apparently introduced a diary of finds, which was kept alongside the excavation diary (fig. 2).

 

 

Fig. 2: Flyleaf and title page of the find diary of the Petersen-Dörpfeld excavation between the Pnyx and the ›Theseion‹ in March 1887. D-DAI-Athen-Archiv-NL Dörpfeld

Probably after this excavation, in the spring, recipients of the travel grant regularly awarded to two to four young archaeologists by the German Archaeological Institute took a trip to Olympia. It was on this trip that the only photograph of Petersen during his term in office in Athens was taken (for the identity of all the people in the photograph, see Brandt 2019, fig. 2 with caption).

Fig. 3a: Olympia, 1886/1887: The Institute directors with travel-grant recipients in Olympia. First Secretary Eugen Petersen at left, Second Secretary Wilhelm Dörpfeld with light-colored cap center. Stadtarchiv Wuppertal ND 23 Nachlass Wilhelm Dörpfeld, photographer unknown
Fig. 3b: Olympia, 1886/1887: Eugen Petersen during his term as First Secretary of the department. Stadtarchiv Wuppertal ND 23 Nachlass Wilhelm Dörpfeld, detail, photographer unknown

(Fig. 3 a. b). As mentioned earlier, Petersen had written an important study of the art of Phidias in Olympia long before the trip, but Wilhelm Dörpfeld was presumably the actual leader of the trip on account of his longstanding familiarity with the site as the technical director of the early excavation in 1875–1881.

 

It apparently soon became clear that the personalities of the two men made smooth collaboration impossible. The Executive Committee, thereupon, seized the opportunity to appoint Petersen, after just nine months in office, to the position of First Secretary in Rome, which had unexpectedly become vacant after the death of Wilhelm Henzen (fig. 4). This decision amounted to a promotion and eased tensions in Athens, where Dörpfeld now rose to First Secretary.

Fig. 4: Announcement of the appointment of Eugen Petersen to First Secretary of the Rome department and of Wilhelm Dörpfeld to First Secretary of the Athens Department. Archiv DAI Athen, Altregistratur Verfügungen

The Lokroi Epizephyrioi Project

Interestingly, the end of Petersen’s career in Athens was not the end of his collaboration with Dörpfeld. When Petersen began an excavation in Lokroi Epizephyrioi with Paolo Orsi, Dörpfeld traveled to Italy with the blessing of the Executive Committee

Fig. 5: Annual report by W. Dörpfeld from 1889/1890 to the Executive Committee, in which he gives an account of his trip to »Lokri«. Archiv DAI Athen, Altregistratur Berichte

(fig. 5) to draw plans of the temple discovered there and take a series of photographs of finds and contexts. Dörpfeld brought the photographs back with him to Athens, and there the glass negatives and their copies remain today as a physical part of the photographic archive in Athens and are available online via the photographic database of the DAI [link: https://arachne.dainst.org/entity/8341]. On some of these photographs, the excavator Petersen can be seen, and presumably also the Italian archaeologist Paolo Orsi (Malacrino – Musumeci 2018), which whose permission and participation Petersen conducted the excavation.

Fig. 6: Lokroi Epizephyrioi, 1889, photograph of the excavator Eugen Petersen and his colleague Paolo Orsi; D-DAI-ATH-Locri-Epizephyrii-0006_detail, photograph by Wilhelm Dörpfeld
Fig. 7: Locroi Epizephyrioi 1889, Eugen Petersen, D-DAI-ATH-Locri-Epizephyrii-0014_Detail, photograph by Wilhelm Dörpfeld
Fig. 8: Plan of the temple in Lokroi Epizephyrioi and its different construction phases (drawn by W. Dörpfeld in late 1889); D-DAI-ATH-Locri-Epizephyrii-0016, photographer unknown

These pictures include two that reproduce Dörpfeld’s drawings of different construction phases of the temple. We can imagine a scenario in which Dörpfeld took his preliminary plans from the field back to Athens, completed them for publication, and subsequently made a photographic copy for the Institute before sending them to Petersen.

As Petersen later told a colleague in a different context (Wickert 1979, 11) he found Dörpfeld extremely intense – almost frenetic – during their collaboration in Lokroi, but he nonetheless respected him and considered him an honest man.

 

Retirement and work visit to Athens

Hence it is no surprise that in 1907, two years after Petersen had retired in 1905, he was invited to be Dörpfeld’s guest during a final visit to Athens and, as was the custom, signed Dörpfeld’s guestbook. Now almost seventy years old, Petersen had made the trip to conclude studies that he had begun during his time in Athens. He thus composed the volume ›Die Burgtempel der Athenaia‹ (›The citadel temples of the Athenaia‹), which appeared in 1907, in which he distanced himself from Dörpfeld’s methodology in matter-of-fact terms and developed points of criticism that he had touched on in Athenische Mitteilungen 1887 as an appendix to Dörpfeld’s article about the old temple of Athena. He then published a richly illustrated work on Athens intended for a wider audience in the series ›Berühmte Kunststätten‹ (›Famous art sites‹) in 1908; the Acropolis naturally featured in it prominently. Both volumes are late fruits of Petersen’s time in Athens. He also wrote predominantly on Greek subjects in the following years until his death in 1919.

 

For Petersen’s bibliography, see https://zenon.dainst.org/ author: Petersen, Eugen Adolf Hermann,‏ ‎ 1836–1919

 

Literature

Blanck 1988

  1. Blanck, Eugen Petersen (1836–1919), in: R. Lullies – W. Schiering (eds.), Archäologenbildnisse – Porträts und Kurzbiographien von Klassischen Archäologen deutscher Sprache (Mainz 1988) 63 f.

Brandt 2019

  1. Brandt, Paul Wolters – in den Blickpunkt gerückt, in: DAI AtheNea 2019, 96–97

Malacrino – Musumeci 2018

  1. Malacrino – M. Musumeci (eds.), Paolo Orsi – Alle origini dell’archeologia tra Calabria e Sicilia, MArRC Catalogi 18 (Regio Calabria 2018)

Petersen 1890

  1. Petersen, Tempel in Lokri, RM 5, 1890, 11–227

Von Steuben 2004

  1. von Steuben (ed.), Adolf Michaelis – Archäologische Reisen in Griechenland 1860 und 1886 (Möhnesee 2004)

Wickert 1979

  1. Wickert, Zur Geschichte der Abteilung Athen des Deutschen Archäologischen Instituts von 1879 bis 1929, Beiträge zur Geschichte des Deutschen Archäologischen Instituts, DAIGeschDok 2 (Mainz 1979)